TEEK

Teemad

Topics

Kõikidel alates 2022/2023. õppeaastast immatrikuleeritud doktorantidel on kohustus koostada ja esitada atesteerimisdokumente edaspidi TEEK-is.

2024/2025. õppeaastast immatrikuleeritud doktorandid said TEEKi õpingute algusest kasutusele võtta. Nad koostavad TEEKis individuaaplaani, kõik perioodiplaanid ja atesteerimisaruanded.

Enne 2024/2025. õppeaastat immatrikuleeritud doktorantidele, keda 2025. aasta talvel atesteeritakse, on TEEKi loodud atesteeritava perioodi kinnitatud (tühi) perioodiplaan, et neil oleks võimalik rakenduses oma atesteerimisaruannet täitma hakata. Atesteerimiskomisjoni poolt kinnitatud perioodiplaani palume doktorandil lisada manusena atesteerimisaruandele.

Samuti soovitame doktorantidel sisestada oma individuaalplaan TEEKi vormi. Sellega algatab doktorant ametlikult individuaalplaani muutmise ning see tuleb TEEKis saata juhendaja(te)le kooskõlastamiseks ning seejärel atesteerimiskomisjonile kinnitamiseks.

Enne 2024/2025. õppeaastat immatrikuleeritud doktorantidele, keda atesteeritakse 2025. a. kevadel või suvel, luuakse 2025. a. esimeses pooles TEEKi atesteeritava perioodi kinnitatud (tühi) perioodiplaan, et nad saaksid rakenduses oma atesteerimisaruannet täitma hakata. (Anname perioodiplaani loomisest doktorantide listi kaudu teada.)

Samuti soovitame doktorantidel sisestada oma individuaalplaan TEEKi vormi (selle tegevusega saab juba täna alustada). Sellega algatab doktorant ametlikult individuaalplaani muutmise ning see tuleb TEEKis saata juhendaja(te)le kooskõlastamiseks ning seejärel atesteerimiskomisjonile kinnitamiseks.

Enne 2022/2023. õppeaastat immatrikuleeritud doktorandid õppekava erisuste tõttu TEEK-i kasutada ei saa ja neil tuleb ka edaspidi kasutada Wordi-faile ning oma plaanid ja aruanded ÕIS-i üles laadida.

Doktorandi plaanidel ja aruannetel on järgmised olekud:

mustand - koostamise faasis olev dokument, mis on nähtav ainult doktorandile
jagatud - koostamise faasis oleva dokument, mida on jagatud juhendaja(te)ga tagasisidestamiseks ning mis on nähtav doktorandile ja tema juhendaja(te)le
kooskõlastamise ootel - valmis dokument, mille doktorant on saatnud juhendaja(te)le kooskõlastamiseks. Dokumente kuvatakse doktorandile, juhendaja(te)le, skoopi kuuluvale erialajuhile, skoopi kuuluvale atesteerimise korraldajale ning aktiivses komisjonis olevale komisjoni liikmele
kooskõlastamisel - valmis dokument, millie kooskõlastamisega tegeleb vähemalt üks juhendaja. Dokumente kuvatakse doktorandile, juhendaja(te)le, skoopi kuuluvale erialajuhile, skoopi kuuluvale atesteerimise korraldajale ning aktiivses komisjonis olevale komisjoni liikmele
kooskõlastatud - valmis dokument, mis on juhendajate poolt kooskõlastatud. Dokumente kuvatakse doktorandile, juhendaja(te)le, skoopi kuuluvale erialajuhile, skoopi kuuluvale atesteerimise korraldajale ning aktiivses komisjonis olevale komisjoni liikmele
kinnitamisel - doktorant on parandanud oma atesteerimisdokumenti vastavalt atesteerimiskomisjoni lisatud parandusettepanekutele ning saatnud selle erialajuhile kinnitamiseks. Dokumente kuvatakse doktorandile, juhendaja(te)le, skoopi kuuluvale erialajuhile, skoopi kuuluvale atesteerimise korraldajale ning aktiivses komisjonis olevale komisjoni liikmele
lisatud parandusettepanekud - atesteerimiskomisjoni otsus on atesteerida doktorant positiivselt eeskirja p. 79.1. alusel. Atesteerimiskomisjon teeb doktorandile ettepaneku atesteerimisdokumenti parandada või täiendada ning määrab ülesande täitmiseks tähtaja. Pärast paranduste tegemist saadab doktorant dokumendi erialajuhile kinnitamiseks (NB! Hetkel ei lähe erialajuhile selle kohta automaatset teadet (lisandub edaspidi), palume atesteerimiskomisjonide sekretäride abi erialajuhtide teavitamisel.). Dokumente kuvatakse doktorandile, juhendaja(te)le, skoopi kuuluvale erialajuhile, skoopi kuuluvale atesteerimise korraldajale ning aktiivses komisjonis olevale komisjoni liikmele
atesteerimata - atesteerimiskomisjoni otsus on jätta doktorant atesteerimata eeskirja p. 79.4. alusel. Dokumente kuvatakse doktorandile, juhendaja(te)le, skoopi kuuluvale erialajuhile, skoopi kuuluvale atesteerimise korraldajale ning aktiivses komisjonis olevale komisjoni liikmele
negatiivselt atesteeritud - atesteerimiskomisjoni otsus on atesteerida doktorant negatiivselt eeskirja p. 79.3. alusel. Dokumente kuvatakse doktorandile, juhendaja(te)le, skoopi kuuluvale erialajuhile, skoopi kuuluvale atesteerimise korraldajale ning aktiivses komisjonis olevale komisjoni liikmele
kinnitatud - 1) doktorant on positiivselt atesteeritud eeskirja p. 79.1. alusel. 2) erialajuht on kinnitanud doktorandipoolsed muudatusel vastavalt atesteerimiskomisjoni lisatud ettepanekutele (doktorant on positiivselt atesteeritud). 3) erialajuht on kinnitanud doktorandi 1. aasta 1. semestri perioodiplaani. Dokumente kuvatakse doktorandile, juhendaja(te)le, skoopi kuuluvale erialajuhile, skoopi kuuluvale atesteerimise korraldajale ning aktiivses komisjonis olevale komisjoni liikmele

All doctoral students matriculated from the academic year 2024/2025 are obliged to prepare and submit their progress review documents in TEEK.

Doctoral students matriculated in the 2024/2025 academic year were able to use TEEK from the beginning of their studies. They will prepare an individual plan, all period plans, and progress review reports in TEEK.

For doctoral students matriculated before the 2024/2025 academic year who will be assessed in the winter of 2025, TEEK has created an accepted (empty) period plan for the assessed period so that they can start filling out their progress review report in the application. The doctoral student is kindly requested to attach the period plan accepted by the progress review committee as a file to the progress review report.

We also recommend that doctoral students enter their individual plan into the TEEK form. This officially initiates the change of the individual plan, which must be sent to the supervisor(s) in TEEK and then to the progress review committee for acceptance.

For doctoral students matriculated before the 2024/2025 academic year who will be assessed in the spring or summer of 2025, an accepted (empty) period plan for the TEEK assessment period will be created in the first half of 2025 so that they can start filling out their progress review report in the application. (We will notify the doctoral students about the creation of the period plan via the doctoral student list.)

We also recommend that doctoral students enter their individual plan into the TEEK form (they can start this activity today). This officially initiates the change of the individual plan and it must be sent to the supervisor(s) in TEEK and then to the progress review committee for acceptance.

Doctoral students matriculated before the 2022/2023 academic year cannot use TEEK due to the specifics of the curriculum and will continue to have to use Word files and upload their plans and reports to SIS.

Doctoral student plans and reports have the following statuses:

draft - a document in the drafting phase that is visible only to the doctoral student
shared - a document in the drafting phase that has been shared with the supervisor(s) for feedback and is visible to the doctoral student and their supervisor(s)
waiting acceptance - a completed document that the doctoral student has sent to the supervisor(s) for acceptance. The documents are visible to the doctoral student, supervisor(s), the head of the specialisation within the scope, the progress review administrator within the scope, and the member of the active progress review committee
acceptance in progress - a completed document that is being reviewed for acceptance by at least one supervisor. The documents are visible to the doctoral student, supervisor(s), the head of the specialisation within the scope, the progress review administrator within the scope, and the member of the active progress review committee
accepted - a completed document accepted by the supervisor(s). The documents are visible to the doctoral student, supervisor(s), the head of the specialisation within the scope, the progress review administrator within the scope, and the member of the active progress review committee
waiting for confirmation - the doctoral student has made improvements to his/her progress review document in accordance with the improvement proposals attached by the progress review committee and sent it to the head of the specialisation for approval. The documents are visible to the doctoral student, supervisor(s), the head of the specialisation within the scope, the progress review administrator within the scope, and the member of the active progress review committee
with suggestions for improvement - the decision of the pogress review committee is to assess the doctoral student positively on the basis of p. 79.1. of the regulations. The progress review committee proposes to the doctoral student to correct or supplement the progress review document and sets a deadline for completing the task. After making the corrections, the doctoral student sends the document to the head of the specialisation for approval (NB! Currently, the head of the specialisation is not automatically notified about this (will be added later), we ask for the assistance of the progress review administrators in informing the head of the specialisation.). The documents are visible to the doctoral student, supervisor(s), the head of the specialisation within the scope, the progress review administrator within the scope, and the member of the active progress review committee
not assessed - the decision of the progress review committee is to not assess a doctoral student based on section 79.4 of the regulations. The documents are visible to the doctoral student, supervisor(s), the head of the specialisation within the scope, the progress review administrator within the scope, and the member of the active progress review committee
negative assessment - the decision of the progress review committee is to assess the doctoral student negatively on the basis of section 79.3 of the regulations. The documents are visible to the doctoral student, supervisor(s), the head of the specialisation within the scope, the progress review administrator within the scope, and the member of the active progress review committee
confirmed - 1) the doctoral student has been positively assessed based on section 79.1 of the regulations. 2) the head of the specialisation has confirmed the changes made by the doctoral student in accordance with the proposals attached by the progress review committee (the doctoral student has been positively assessed). 3) the head of the specialisation has confirmed the doctoral student's period plan for the 1st semester of the 1st year. The documents are visible to the doctoral student, supervisor(s), the head of the specialisation within the scope, the progress review administrator within the scope, and the member of the active progress review committee